You are hereHome ›
Trying to answer the question "If you are so worried about global warming, why are you opposed to fracking to increase natural gas production?" led us to research our recent report Natural Gas and Global Warming.
In recent months, utilities have worked to put in place a policy that could slow the growth of rooftop solar: high residential demand charges. An electric bill with a large demand charge can limit the cost savings of solar energy because just one interval of high peak demand – at night or on a cloudy day – can result in charges that undercut the financial benefits of generating solar power over the course of an entire month.
Today we released Lighting the Way 4, our fourth annual installment of reports on the states with the most solar energy, and the public policies that have helped them get there. Once again, the evidence is clear: The states with the most solar capacity aren’t necessarily those with the most sunshine – they are the states that have adopted policies to make it easy and affordable for people, businesses and utilities to “go solar.”
Now is the time for states like Pennsylvania to set in place strong bonding requirements to ensure that money is available for environmental cleanup and the health of people living in the shadow of fracking are not put at risk – regardless of how financially sick drilling firms may be.
The ITF study gives us a detailed picture of the heaven that might be if we were to embrace a new transportation paradigm less dependent on personal car ownership.
Consumers who buy an EV instead of a gas-powered vehicle should not only recoup fuel costs over the lifetime of their vehicle, they should expect to see cost savings of thousands of dollars. And those savings will take place whether gas prices stay abnormally low, or go up over time.
The very people who have the most to gain from bigger or better highways – heavy drivers – are also those with the most to lose from increasing the gas tax that pays for those improvements. The result is that heavy drivers have a strong incentive as political actors to get someone – anyone – else to pay for the roads.
Transportation just became the leading source of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States. But until recently, some of the biggest sources of transportation emissions – medium- and heavy-duty trucks like tractor trailers and big pick-ups – faced few requirements to reduce their pollution impacts.
For operators like Range Resources, which operates more than 1,000 wells in Pennsylvania, the blanket bonding requirement equates to roughly $600 per well.
Unplugged wells threaten to pollute drinking water and can leak the potent greenhouse gas methane, endangering communities both local and global.
There is no one-size-fits-all solution to the problems of our cities, or to decarbonizing transportation.
America's cities can do far more to drive the growth of solar energy – with or without state policy support. This May, San Francisco became the first major city in the country to require solar panels on new construction of homes and businesses.
Net metering isn’t just good for solar consumers – it’s good for everyone. That’s the conclusion of a new study from the Brookings Institution, which, after reviewing evidence from around the country, found that net metering is a net benefit to the grid and to electric customers.
A key trait of many organizers and advocates is the ability to question why the established world is the way it is and to have the creative capacity to envision an alternative. This isn’t creativity in the K-12 school sense—can you make up a short story, can you draw a picture of a fantasy creature—but a more subtle kind that involves making tweaks to the familiar and mundane.
In anticipation of the release of A New Way Forward: Envisioning a Carbon-Free Transportation System, we've compiled some of our recent blogs on transportation and climate change.
If electrification and renewable energy alone can get us to 100% carbon-free travel, why worry about transit, bike lanes, shared vehicles, land-use policy or any other strategy for greening transportation? Here are five reasons why.
Estimating the costs of losing the Clean Power Plan using newly released data from the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration.
As America seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, policy-makers need to understand that not all our cities face the same opportunities or challenges.
Electric vehicles, multiple flavors of “shared mobility” services, information technology apps and tools, new concepts for building “complete streets,” and other advances give policy-makers an ever-expanding array of ingredients that can be combined in new and exciting ways to create cleaner, greener and more efficient systems for moving people and goods around our communities.
If you can dream it, you can do it. Or, rather, only if you can dream it can you then proceed to do it. Acknowledging that dreams sometimes come true is the first step in opening the door for transformative change.